<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SKYndt - UAV FLIR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skyndt.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skyndt.com</link>
	<description>UAV Inspection Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:00:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Garrow Aircraft&#8217;s Verticopter Vtol Concept by FireXtheRipper</title>
		<link>http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/comment-page-1/#comment-12470</link>
		<dc:creator>FireXtheRipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/#comment-12470</guid>
		<description>

						how is it possible that the prob is in the gravity center of the plane? if one person﻿ decides to lean back the gravity point changes. what if theres only one person and not 2 ore what if the throw something out of the window ?
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how is it possible that the prob is in the gravity center of the plane? if one person﻿ decides to lean back the gravity point changes. what if theres only one person and not 2 ore what if the throw something out of the window ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Garrow Aircraft&#8217;s Verticopter Vtol Concept by bivvyfox</title>
		<link>http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/comment-page-1/#comment-12469</link>
		<dc:creator>bivvyfox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/#comment-12469</guid>
		<description>

						it compares well with helicopters for costs.  how can you be so sure it is &quot;complex, ineffective&quot;﻿ ? it would help if we had some facts to back you what you say. We need more than you have a pilot&#039;s licence.
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it compares well with helicopters for costs.  how can you be so sure it is &#8220;complex, ineffective&#8221;﻿ ? it would help if we had some facts to back you what you say. We need more than you have a pilot&#8217;s licence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Garrow Aircraft&#8217;s Verticopter Vtol Concept by ollyk22</title>
		<link>http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/comment-page-1/#comment-12468</link>
		<dc:creator>ollyk22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/#comment-12468</guid>
		<description>

						Reminds me of something out﻿ of Elite 2 :) Nicer design than that muller sky car!
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of something out﻿ of Elite 2 <img src='http://skyndt.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Nicer design than that muller sky car!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Garrow Aircraft&#8217;s Verticopter Vtol Concept by danklaue</title>
		<link>http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/comment-page-1/#comment-12467</link>
		<dc:creator>danklaue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/#comment-12467</guid>
		<description>

						You&#039;d be surprised... it happens to BE﻿ something new.  No patents have been filed for such a design, and Garrow Aircraft just got granted its patents for the Verticopter.  There&#039;s been attempts at VTOL aircraft, some more successful than others... but this is definitely a new way of doing it.  Look into it!
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d be surprised&#8230; it happens to BE﻿ something new.  No patents have been filed for such a design, and Garrow Aircraft just got granted its patents for the Verticopter.  There&#8217;s been attempts at VTOL aircraft, some more successful than others&#8230; but this is definitely a new way of doing it.  Look into it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Garrow Aircraft&#8217;s Verticopter Vtol Concept by danklaue</title>
		<link>http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/comment-page-1/#comment-12466</link>
		<dc:creator>danklaue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/#comment-12466</guid>
		<description>

						Investors.  With people like Moller having robbed investors of their trust towards VTOL and flying car concepts, it&#039;s really hard these days to find people willing to bet their money on such a﻿ concept.  Radio Control versions are in their test phase right now... and will hopefully be mass-produced within a short while.  This should increase people&#039;s trust towards this design and concept.
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Investors.  With people like Moller having robbed investors of their trust towards VTOL and flying car concepts, it&#8217;s really hard these days to find people willing to bet their money on such a﻿ concept.  Radio Control versions are in their test phase right now&#8230; and will hopefully be mass-produced within a short while.  This should increase people&#8217;s trust towards this design and concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Garrow Aircraft&#8217;s Verticopter Vtol Concept by 02915a</title>
		<link>http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/comment-page-1/#comment-12465</link>
		<dc:creator>02915a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/#comment-12465</guid>
		<description>

						i hate people who get patents before you do! and people just﻿ because they got the patten by this corupted world dont make them the ones to come up with idea!
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hate people who get patents before you do! and people just﻿ because they got the patten by this corupted world dont make them the ones to come up with idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Garrow Aircraft&#8217;s Verticopter Vtol Concept by 33vortex</title>
		<link>http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/comment-page-1/#comment-12464</link>
		<dc:creator>33vortex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/#comment-12464</guid>
		<description>

						Neat concept, I doubt it has the payload capacity of a large helicopter though. With only 2 seats its uses are limited. Perhaps the concept can be﻿ carried over to a larger design capable of heavy payload applications. GPH? What about noise levels?
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat concept, I doubt it has the payload capacity of a large helicopter though. With only 2 seats its uses are limited. Perhaps the concept can be﻿ carried over to a larger design capable of heavy payload applications. GPH? What about noise levels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lite Machines&#8217; Voyeur Vtol Uav &#8211; The Real Thing by UAVguy11</title>
		<link>http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/lite-machines-voyeur-vtol-uav-the-real-thing-93/comment-page-1/#comment-12460</link>
		<dc:creator>UAVguy11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/lite-machines-voyeur-vtol-uav-the-real-thing-93/#comment-12460</guid>
		<description>

						GuitarNerd1 you obviously work for Lite Machines.  I ask you this- are you trying to persuade me &amp; the rest of the engineering world of your company&#039;s competency OR are you simply trying to persuade yourself?  Also, here is some free advice, when you say stuff like &#039;I&#039;m assuming any further details are now top secret﻿ (they both recently got their clearances)&#039; It makes you sound like a 3rd grader, gives your story no more credibility &amp; makes us wonder why a &#039;top secret&#039; video would be on youtube
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GuitarNerd1 you obviously work for Lite Machines.  I ask you this- are you trying to persuade me &#038; the rest of the engineering world of your company&#8217;s competency OR are you simply trying to persuade yourself?  Also, here is some free advice, when you say stuff like &#8216;I&#8217;m assuming any further details are now top secret﻿ (they both recently got their clearances)&#8217; It makes you sound like a 3rd grader, gives your story no more credibility &#038; makes us wonder why a &#8216;top secret&#8217; video would be on youtube</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Garrow Aircraft&#8217;s Verticopter Vtol Concept by Beau74</title>
		<link>http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/comment-page-1/#comment-12463</link>
		<dc:creator>Beau74</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/garrow-aircrafts-verticopter-vtol-concept-95/#comment-12463</guid>
		<description>

						Well, it sure is pretty.﻿
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it sure is pretty.﻿</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lite Machines&#8217; Voyeur Vtol Uav &#8211; The Real Thing by GuitarNerd1</title>
		<link>http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/lite-machines-voyeur-vtol-uav-the-real-thing-93/comment-page-1/#comment-12459</link>
		<dc:creator>GuitarNerd1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skyndt.com/2009/10/14/lite-machines-voyeur-vtol-uav-the-real-thing-93/#comment-12459</guid>
		<description>

						I don&#039;t work for them, and I won&#039;t be baited.  I just know that this is an early﻿ test video and the current state of things is probably not a matter of public record.  You&#039;re a rocket scientist - this is aeronautics.
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t work for them, and I won&#8217;t be baited.  I just know that this is an early﻿ test video and the current state of things is probably not a matter of public record.  You&#8217;re a rocket scientist &#8211; this is aeronautics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
